Follow me on twitter!

Connect with Facebook

Sections:

Underground Film Review Episode 5

I’ve been posting all our olds shows. Kinda’ like the Underground Film Review The Lost shows. This was the first one we ever did. It also got deleted back around a year ago when our site got hacked and I had to rebuild it. Have a listen and enjoy. If you like it, download it on ITUNES!

-Collin

Jackass 3-D review – kinda’ – mostly me bitching about how they were mean to animals.

Jackass 3-D was pretty lame and they were a little mean to animals, which is annoying.

The Animal stuff:

Yes, I kind of have to say it, Jackass 3-D was too mean to animals. It has never bothered me before, but this time I just felt a little weird. I’m not an extremist when it comes to animal cruelty, but I just think the movie took it too far. I don’t like seeing animals being taken advantage of for our entertainment. It just isn’t nice. I’m a card carrying carnivore and eat meat 6 to 7 times a day, but having scared and confused animals perform tricks and aggressions for human amusement is stupid. Also, I’m well aware that the stunts were monitored by special interest animal groups such as American Humane Association (ironically?). But many of the stunts did go unmonitored.

Also, even on top of that, I read that some of the shots were faked – such as the snake pit with Bam, so that there was no actual snakes in there, but still, it sits weird with me. Why have to fake them? It says the wrong things about people and animals….I think?

The argument that the Jackass crew is doing worst things to themselves is not an acceptable excuse for doing cruel(ish) things to animals. The Jackass crew are human beings and can use reason to decide danger vs non-danger. The animals are scared and defending themselves with fight or flight and when they run and hit people….it is kind of fucked up.

This might sound like babyish bitching, ha maybe it is, but the point is you shouldn’t take advantage of an animal’s fears for personal entertainment. It begs the question: What is too far? Blood sport is too far, obviously, but where do we draw the line?

For example, Steve-O, a proud vegan and animal activist, said he felt a twinge of guilt over getting in the ring with a ram and having it run full blast at him. Why did he feel this way? Because it is fucked up. That little ram is scared shitless and thinks they’re going to hurt him. Moreover, Ryan Dunn was using a French Horn and the ram ran its head into the horn. Now I know that its head is designed to take an unbelievable amount of force, but it is the principle. The poor little bastard doesn’t deserve that, it just isn’t necessary.

Moreover, Knoxville thinks it is hilarious to get himself nailed by a buffalo…and so it is, but it isn’t necessarily cool that they’re putting the buffalo at risk by having it run at him full force and hit him. I’m sure it poses little threat to the buffalo, but c’mon man, what’s the point? It’s like the bee thing. They filled a apparatus with bees and hit it like a tether ball. Sure, bees suck, but they don’t have to be swatted and or killed for a laugh. I read that very few of the bees were real, mostly CGI, but still, lame.

Anyway, the movie, real quick:

The gags were…alright. I found myself just wanting more. After the second film’s terrorist skit I can’t get to that level of awesomeness.

The staginess was also bothersome and I know that just comes with the project, but sometimes it was just too much. A lot of the skits went on too long such as the gorilla skit and Knoxville as an old person. The opening and closings were really the low point. They were just too obsessed with being 3-D. Yes, 3-D is cool, but they ain’t James Cameron. Do what you’re good at.

A perfect example of my gripe would be the tee ball to Steve-o’s dick scene. Here’s how it SHOULD have gone down:

Either A.) It is a quick fade-in, BOW, ball goes into his dick, fade-out. That is hilarious. Because it is mysterious, weird, and just insane. The build up was too big for something that wasn’t that clever.

Or B.) The camera plays tricky in revealing exactly what is happening…then bam, shot in the balls.

I don’t know, maybe it is the old skate boarder in me, but this film just felt too polished.

Collin says: C

-Collin

Hot Tub Time Machine


The Hangover was widely crowned a comedic masterpiece by audiences and critics alike. It won the Golden Globe for Best Comedy or Musical and grossed over 400 million dollars worldwide.

The Hangover is indeed very good, but a lesser-seen film, endlessly compared to The Hangover, is called Hot Tub Time Machine – a movie I claim is the Citizen Kane of comedy. That is obviously a hyperbole, but this movie is that great.

The film follows Adam (John Cusack) and Nick (Craig Robinson) as they reunite with their friend Lou (Rob Corddry) when he may or may not have attempted suicide while drumming along to a song in his car. How he does this I won’t reveal, but it is ludicrously funny.

After discovering their friend Lou is in trouble, Adam and Nick decide to rediscover better times by bringing Lou to the Kodiak Valley Ski Resort where they used to party in the nineteen eighties. Adam brings along his nephew Jacob (Clark Duke) and when the group arrives at the Ski Resort they quickly discover, like themselves, the place has turned to shit.

The group quickly hops in their room’s hot tub and are transported back in time as their former selves in 1986, except for Jacob who kinda’ stands outside time. I guess? The movie moves along with a lighting pace all headed by the genius performance by Rob Corddry, who was given free-reign to run wild as Lou. Every moment, every line, and every piece of body language has comedic value and entertainment wrapped in it. It reminded me of Kevin Kline in A Fish Called Wanda, a performance that won him an Oscar.

Am I saying Corddry deserves an Oscar? Probably not, but his performance should not be ignored. He is able to mesh the difficult position of a fast-paced, joke-a-second screwball comedy with genuinely heart-felt moments of tenderness, regret, and the realizations of a life wasted.

Which raises another point – The Hangover also offers bromance and tenderness for its characters, as well as a plot much more feasible in space and time. Then why did Hot Tub Time Machine feel more real to me?

It might be because this film is based on fantasies and regrets we all have. Such as: What would have happened had I stuck with her or him? Why didn’t I become who I wanted to be? What if I’d thought of that million-dollar idea first? Is life really preordained? And even a surprisingly profound question: Is time linear?

How about the comment: “Oh, her? We’re not really friends anymore. We just kinda’ grew apart.” Have you ever said that? I sure have. All these ideas are explored through the lens of screwball, gross-out comedy.

There is an exchange that really struck a cord with me – when Adam is arguing with his ex-girlfriend about her dumping him. She dismisses his sadness, commenting that he has a lot of success ahead of him and he painfully replies that he doesn’t.

When people ask me what this movie was like I say it is kind of like A Christmas Carol meets Dumb & Dumber. I mean it.

Hot Tub Time Machine is a paradox. It provides rapid-fire jokes with characters so destroyed by regret and emptiness that we kind of see ourselves in them. Oh yeah, and there are like a thousand awesome pop-culture references from the eighties…

Release date March 2010

I say: A
You’ll say:B

Top Ten Living Directors

This type of list needs a few honorable mentions. I’ve taken the liberty of three: Paul Thomas Anderson, Woody Allen, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu

10. Alfonso Cuaron

His film Y Tu Mama Tambien might be me my favorite movie ever made. I don’t know exactly why. Another one of his films, Children of Men, ranks among the best science fiction movies ever made. He is one of the three Mexican New Wave directors, all of which are on this list.

9. Quentin Tarantino

I constantly knock the guy. I don’t know what I dislike about him. It is not unlike my annoyance of Wes Anderson. Film School students probably jaded me. Tarantino’s Kill Bill is in my top ten favorite films.

8. Christopher Nolan

We’ll see how this guy pans out, but come this summer, Inception might rank him #1 in Hollywood.

7.David Lynch

What a master. Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, Muholand Drive, and the great Inland Empire are greats. What an enigmatic genius. What a weird visionary.  He’s one of the few avant-garde directors who can remain in the mainstream. I’m hoping digital filmmaking hasn’t freed his madness too much. At least financial constraints made him answer to producers.

6. Guillermo Del Toro


This dude is a Mexican god.  Pan’s Labyrinth alone would have gotten him on this list.

5.Darren Aronofsky

I read some people who claim this dude the next Kubrick. Obviously people might be jumping the gun a bit. But Aronofsky is a baby in terms of age. Pi, Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain, and The Wrestler are all great films. He’s definitely not the greatest living director, not by a long shot, but has the potential to be.

4. Peter Jackson

It is funny because my brother and I were already PJ fans before he became famous with Lord of the Rings. His films Dead Alive and Bad Taste remain cinema’s bloodiest, weirdest treasures. I was skeptical hearing that he was going to helm the LOTR’s series. Who would have thought?

3. Werner Herzog

Who is Herzog? Well, most won’t know his name. He made a kind-of famous documentary about a dude getting eaten by a bear. Other than that, he isn’t a house hold name. Me thinks Bad Lieutenant will bring him into more widespread acclaim. See his movies.

2. Clint Eastwood

A lot of people dismiss him as a ludicrous director from a boring age of filmmaking. I just say piss off to all of them. Unforgiven, Mystic River, Changling, Million Dollar Baby, Letters from Iwo Jima, Gran Tarino; what great movies. He has been pumping out great movies in the best two decades. He will likely not make films in his nineties so I’m hoping his last is more of the same.

1. Martin Scorsese

If you haven’t caught Mean Streets, his early mafia film, go see it. In fact, watch all his movies. Raging Bull remains his triumph, but so does his ability to adjust to Hollywood’s trends. The  seventies was high time for small, art house movies in the mainstream. Godfather probably wouldn’t get made these days and if it did, it would be hard to find.

These days Spielberg sucks outside of his film Munich. Coppola went crazy. De Palma is in no man’s land. George Lucas is raping his legacy, as shown in South Park.

All these great directors came from the same generation of greatness, but where everyone else failed, Scorsese flourished. How much Catholic guilt and male insecurity can one man pack into mainstream, audience-friendly films? A lot, that is how much. He is the greatest living director. His only misstep? Making Shutter Island, what an awful ending.

-Collin Gilbert from http://www.podcastfilmreview.com