Spider-Man Reboot: Say It Ain’t So
By Devon Gilbert
As I’ve said before, I’m very open to remakes. Many times they can be very good. I’m also a sucker for comic book/superpower movies. I love pretty much all the comic book movies from X-Men to Blade. I even think the bad ones are decent though disappointing, like Daredevil, Fantastic Four, and Ghost Rider. And I will tune into The Cape TV show, just like I did for Heroes and No Ordinary Family (which is getting much better for those who give a damn.) So it goes without saying I thoroughly enjoyed the Spider-Man trilogy, even the third, which I feel, was unfairly dissed. Audiences apparently feel the same way: the trilogy has grossed slightly under 2 ½ billion dollars and has received unanimous praise, though it seems people find the third disappointing but okay. This franchise was launched in 2002 and ended in 2007. The reboot will arrive in theaters just five years later in 2012.
The Batman series is probably the best excuse to reboot a franchise, since the reboots are considered to be the best Batman movies. There was an eight-year gap between Batman and Robin and Batman Begins, which is still too small to consider a reboot. However, the last good Batman movie, Tim Burton’s Batman Returns, was released in 1992, thirteen years before the reboot. Also worth noting, people unanimously thought everything about Batman and Robin sucked. Even though Spider-Man 3 is clearly the least liked of the trilogy, it’s far from being hated universally. When Christopher Nolan remade Batman, he really had no where to go but up (though obviously he really shot for the moon.)
So it seems a reboot of Spider-Man this early is only a good idea if they really plan on blowing the roof off, which, it sounds like they’re not going to do. First of all, Marc Webb is directing instead of Sam Raimi. Wow, how gay. If nothing else, Raimi had proven comic book worthy with his Evil Dead series and Darkman. Marc Webb has one movie under his belt, the average 500 Days of Summer, which is an indie romance. I have very little faith in his ability to make a great superhero movie.
Second, Andrew Garfield will be replacing Tobey Maguire. Tobey Magurie is Peter Parker (aka Spider-Man.) Nobody can replace him. Just like nobody could replace Elijah Wood as Frodo, Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Terminator, or Harrison Ford as Han Solo. Andrew Garfield is a great actor, especially in The Social Network and Red Riding, but I can’t buy him as a superhero. I think it’s a terrible career move and he’s bound to get angry backlash.
Third, the new script is supposed to have a gritty tone more akin to Nolan’s Batman reboot. 9 times out of 10 I would be thrilled to hear that. However, part of Spider-Man’s charm was the light comic book tone for cryin’ out loud. Dark and gritty just don’t match Spider-Man’s world. There’s no need to go that route. Spider-Man is just supposed to be fun.
Lastly, and worst of all, Peter Parker is going to be back in high school learning how to use his abilities. AHHHHHH! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!!! Who the fuck needs a recap of Parker’s origin. As a matter of fact, I think all new superhero movies should get past the origin story as quickly as possible because they’re all similar and not nearly as interesting as the adventures to come. But the idea of sending Parker back to high school after all his growth in the past three movies is just pathetic, stupid, and more importantly BORING.
Sadly, the Spider-Man reboot will probably be profitable. It will be a big 3D summer movie after all. The executives will be happy, but I’m confident audiences won’t be. Barring a cinematic miracle, this movie will blow.






Recent Comments